
Verdict: Every Law 25 deadline has passed. If your Quebec nonprofit collects donor, volunteer, or staff data, you should already be compliant.
What works: Zeffy's fundraising platform names Law 25 in its NPO Terms and Privacy Policy and documents its data-security posture in writing, reducing the vendor-governance work your Privacy Officer has to do.
What doesn't: Zeffy doesn't replace your Privacy Officer, draft your privacy policy, or complete Privacy Impact Assessments for you. That work still sits with your org.
Best for: Quebec nonprofits of any size that collect donor, volunteer, or staff information.
Worth considering if: You use US-hosted tools (Mailchimp, Google Workspace, Salesforce), run youth programs, or have never audited the consent checkboxes on your donation forms.
Every Law 25 deadline has now passed. If you run a Quebec nonprofit and you collect donor, volunteer, or staff information anywhere (a spreadsheet, a Mailchimp list, a Google Form, a personal Gmail inbox), the law already applies to you. The question is no longer "when do we need to be ready?" but "are we actually compliant today?"
This is a current-state check-up, not a preview. It's written for the kind of Quebec nonprofit where one person wears five hats and donor info sometimes sits in a board member's personal inbox. Every requirement gets a plain-language translation and a self-check question, and the legal claims are sourced to the CAI, LgisQubec, and named law-firm articles. Illustrative samples are flagged as such. This is not legal advice. Confirm anything that matters with your own counsel.

Law 25 (formerly Bill 64) is the Quebec statute that modernized the province's private-sector privacy regime. It amends the Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector (LPRPSP) and is enforced by the Commission d'accs l'information du Qubec (CAI). The rules rolled out in three phases on September 22 of 2022, 2023, and 2024. All three phases are now in force.
The trigger isn't your tax status, your size, or your budget. It's whether you collect personal information about Quebec residents as part of an "organized economic activity." Per BCLP's analysis of the statute, Law 25 has no minimum-size or sector exemption for donor, volunteer, or staff data. A food bank that keeps a volunteer roster is in scope. A community youth program with a registration form is in scope. A small foundation that emails a donor list is in scope.
There is one narrow zone of ambiguity: an organization with no economic activity at all (a purely spiritual group with no donations, no programs, no records) may sit outside the definition of an "enterprise." For nonprofit-specific exception analysis, see the Lexology article Quebec's New Privacy Law 25: Is There a Nonprofit Exception?. The short answer in that piece: probably not.
Self-check: Do you have a spreadsheet, CRM, inbox, or form anywhere that holds a Quebec donor's name and email? If yes, you're in scope.
For a small nonprofit: Stop trying to find a loophole. The honest read of the law is that you're covered. The good news is that compliance for a volunteer-run org is much smaller in practice than the law-firm articles make it sound.
Forget the phased-deadline timeline. As of right now, here is what should already be in place:
For a small nonprofit: If you can answer yes to all five self-checks, the rest of this article is about going from "compliant" to "comfortably compliant." If you can't, the next sections walk you through each gap.
Section 3.1 of the amended LPRPSP requires every enterprise to appoint a Privacy Officer. The statute defaults the role to the person of highest authority in the organization unless that person delegates it (src: BCLP). The name, title, and contact information must be published on the organization's website.
For a volunteer-run org with no CEO, "highest authority" is the practical question. In practice, small orgs often designate the highest available authority: executive director if you have one, board chair or board president if you don't. Confirm against CAI's official guidance for your specific org structure before publishing.
The role itself is about governance, not engineering. The Privacy Officer:
Illustrative website footer text (sample only, confirm with counsel):
Privacy Officer: [Name], [Title]. For privacy questions, access requests, or to report a confidentiality incident, contact [email] or [phone]. We respond within 30 days.
If you use Zeffy's donor management as your fundraising platform, your Privacy Officer can point to Zeffy's compliance posture (named in the NPO Terms and Privacy Policy) for platform-related data, which narrows what they personally need to govern.
For a small nonprofit: Pick the highest-authority person who is willing. Get a sentence on your website with their name and an email. Done in an afternoon. Do not hire a privacy lawyer for this step.
A "confidentiality incident" under Law 25 is any access to, use of, disclosure of, or loss of personal information that is not authorized by law. Examples: a stolen laptop, a misdirected email blast, a database breach, a volunteer forwarding a donor list to a personal account.
Section 3.6 of the amended LPRPSP sets out a two-step process: assess, then notify if the threshold is met (src: Gowling WLG).
The CAI also has investigative and order-issuing powers, so notification is not optional once the threshold is met.
Whether or not you ever cross the threshold, you must keep a register of all incidents. A simple incident log includes:
For CAI-issued guidance, see the CAI's New Privacy Obligations for Businesses fact sheet and the longer French-language Vers la conformit la Loi sur le priv.
For a small nonprofit: A spreadsheet with the six columns above is your incident register. You do not need a software product. You do need to know which person opens it the moment something goes wrong.
A Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) is a written analysis of the privacy risks of a project or process, completed before the activity starts. Under the Act as amended by Law 25, a PIA is mandatory before communicating personal information outside Quebec (Private Sector Act 3.3 / 17; src: BCLP). This is one of three explicit statutory triggers.
For nonprofits, the cross-border trigger is the one that bites. If you use US-hosted tools (Mailchimp, Salesforce, Google Workspace, a US payment processor), you are communicating Quebec residents' personal information outside Quebec, and the PIA obligation applies.
A PIA does not have to be a legal document. It has to be a written assessment that covers, at minimum:
One way to reduce the PIA workload is to consolidate vendors that already document Law 25 posture. Zeffy is one example: the support.zeffy.com data-privacy page lists Stripe (PCI Service Provider Level 1) as the payment sub-processor, SSL/TLS encryption in transit, AWS hosting, and a documented breach-notification procedure. The Law 25 compliance clause is written into the NPO Terms and the Privacy Policy. See Zeffy's data privacy and security overview for the source-of-record on those claims. Zeffy reducing your PIA surface is not the same as Zeffy doing the PIA for you; the obligation still sits with your Privacy Officer.
For a small nonprofit: Inventory every US-hosted tool that touches Quebec donor data. For each, write a one-page PIA. If a tool can't pass a PIA, swap it for one that can. This is the highest-leverage compliance move available to you.
Under Law 25, collecting, using, or sharing personal information about a child under 14 requires consent from the person with parental authority (or a tutor). This affects nonprofits that run youth programs, family event registrations, junior volunteer onboarding, or any signup form that may be filled out by or about a child.
For the under-14 threshold, the primary source is the Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector as amended by Law 25. The CAI's New Privacy Obligations for Businesses sheet summarizes the consent rules.
In practice, for a small org, this looks like:
For a small nonprofit: If you have one youth-facing form, fix that form. You do not need a youth-programs privacy specialist. You need a checkbox and a field for a parent's email.
Article 22 of the LPRPSP (as amended by Law 25) requires prior consent (manifest, free, informed, and specific) to use personal information for commercial or philanthropic prospecting (src: BCLP).
For Quebec nonprofits, this lands on three common activities:
The cleanest path is consent capture at the source. Your nonprofit CRM or donor management system should record, per donor, what they consented to and when, so prospecting-eligible contacts can be filtered cleanly.
For a small nonprofit: Prospecting from purchased lists is no longer a viable channel for Quebec contacts. Lean into opt-in capture at the donation form, and segment your CRM by consent state.
Consent under Law 25 must be manifest, free, informed, and specific. Translated to a donation form, that means:
Illustrative donation-form language (sample only, confirm with counsel):
We collect your name, email, and donation amount to process your gift and send your tax receipt. We do not sell or share your information with partner organizations. To opt in to our monthly newsletter, tick the box below.
Before / after (illustrative only):
Before (not compliant): A single checkbox at the bottom of the donation form, pre-checked, reading "Send me updates and offers from [Org] and our partners."
After (illustrative compliant version, confirm with counsel): Two separate unchecked boxes. The first: "I'd like to receive [Org]'s monthly newsletter (about once a month, easy to unsubscribe)." The second: "I'd like to hear about events from [Org]'s partner organizations." Neither is pre-checked, and neither is required to donate.
Whatever tool you use, the consent checkboxes on your form are where this requirement is met or missed, so audit every one of them against the four tests above. You can read Zeffy's Privacy Policy as a real-world example a Quebec nonprofit can adapt as a starting model.
For a small nonprofit: If your current form is on a generic tool you can't configure consent on, that's the lever to pull. Switching form-builders is faster, cheaper, and more durable than retrofitting consent onto something that doesn't support it.
Law 25 carries two distinct penalty tiers, both significant. Per Osler's analysis citing statute ss. 90.12 to 91:
Enforcement is active, not theoretical. The CAI has had full enforcement powers (AMPs, penal proceedings, investigative orders) since September 22, 2023, and the CAI's 2023-2024 Annual Report records 444 confidentiality-incident declarations received over the year, demonstrating active oversight.
Realistically, a three-volunteer animal rescue is not the target of a C$25 million fine. The realistic risks for a small org are different and arguably worse:
For a small nonprofit: Treat compliance as a donor-trust lever, not a fine-avoidance exercise. The work you do to comply (a real Privacy Officer, a real policy, opt-in consent) is the same work that makes donors give again.
A practical, 12-point self-audit. Aim for yes on every line. Screenshot, print, or paste it into a doc and work through it with your Privacy Officer.
For a small nonprofit: Block 90 minutes on a Saturday. Run the list. Anything you can't answer yes to becomes next week's task list. Most volunteer-run orgs can clear 8 of the 12 in a single afternoon.
Zeffy is a free fundraising platform built specifically for nonprofits. More than 100K+ nonprofits have raised $2B+ on the platform, all at no cost to their organizations. The Law 25 compliance posture is documented in writing rather than implied in marketing copy. What that documentation covers:
Zeffy charges nonprofits nothing: no platform fee, no transaction fee, and no credit card fee. Donors are invited to leave an optional contribution that keeps the platform running.
Honest scope: Zeffy is a fundraising platform, not a privacy-law consultancy. It reduces the surface area that needs a PIA, names Law 25 in its NPO Terms, and gives your Privacy Officer one less vendor to govern. It does not replace your Privacy Officer or your counsel.
Official government sources
Legal analysis
Practical guides
Yes, in almost every case. Law 25 applies to any enterprise conducting organized economic activity that collects, uses, or discloses personal information of Quebec residents, and there is no minimum-size or sector exemption for donor, volunteer, or staff data (src: BCLP). If your nonprofit has a donation form, a volunteer list, or a staff record, you are in scope.
Law 25 3.1 defaults the role to the person of highest authority unless that person delegates it. For a volunteer-run org, the highest authority is typically the executive director, or, if there isn't one, the board chair or board president. Confirm against CAI guidance for your specific structure.
Under 3.6, you assess the incident for "risk of serious injury" based on sensitivity of the information, anticipated consequences, and likelihood of injurious use (src: Gowling WLG). If that threshold is met, you must promptly notify the CAI and the affected individuals. Whether or not the threshold is met, you must log the incident in your confidentiality-incident register.
Yes, if those tools host or process Quebec residents' personal information outside Quebec. Communicating personal information outside Quebec is an explicit statutory trigger for a PIA under Private Sector Act 3.3 / 17 (src: BCLP). This applies to most US-hosted SaaS tools.
Two tiers (src: Osler, citing ss. 90.12 to 91). Administrative Monetary Penalties up to C$10 million or 2% of worldwide turnover (whichever is greater), and penal fines up to C$25 million or 4% of worldwide turnover (whichever is greater). The CAI has had full enforcement powers since September 22, 2023, and the 2023-2024 Annual Report records 444 confidentiality-incident declarations received.
No. Consent under Law 25 must be manifest, free, informed, and specific. A pre-checked box is not manifest consent. Each consent must be a separate, affirmative, unchecked action by the donor.
Yes. Article 22 of the LPRPSP requires prior consent (manifest, free, informed, specific) to use personal information for commercial or philanthropic prospecting (src: BCLP). Purchased or rented Quebec donor lists without per-contact prospecting consent are no longer usable.
Collection, use, or communication of personal information about a minor under 14 requires the consent of the person having parental authority. If you run youth programs or family-event registrations, your form needs a parental-consent field and your records need to keep that consent alongside the child's data.
Law 25: Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector.
The “Coles Notes” from the Commission d’accès à l’information du Québec: New Privacy Obligations for Businesses.
And en français: Vers la conformité à la Loi sur le privé.
1. Loi 25 / Bill 64 - Privacy changes are coming to Québec: Are you ready?
2. Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector.
3. Loi 25 - Nouvelles dispositions protégeant la vie privée des Québécois - Certaines dispositions entrent en vigueur aujourd'hui.
4. An Act to modernize legislative provisions as regards the protection of personal information, SQ 2021, c 25.
5. Quebec’s New Privacy Law 25: Is There a Nonprofit Exception?
6. Vers la conformité à la Loi sur le privé.
7. New Privacy Obligations for Businesses.
8. Quebec Has New Privacy Requirements Already in Place, With More on the Way in 2023.

Online charitable lotteries. 50/50 draws in Quebec. Eligibility for a nonprofit or charity lottery licence. Zeffy can help make sense of lotteries in Quebec.
.webp)